RE: Re: [ukvac] OT: Van insurance
Work this one out £560 to insure a £30k car but £1025 to insure a £10k van.
"The Dalek" <a.williams17@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>Sender: sentto-1013941-15166-1021021438-houseofamusements=compuserve.com@returns.groups.yahoo.com
>Received: from n20.grp.scd.yahoo.com (n20.grp.scd.yahoo.com [66.218.66.76])
> by siaag1af.compuserve.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/SUN-1.12) with SMTP id FAA29319
> for <houseofamusements@compuserve.com>; Fri, 10 May 2002 05:03:59 -0400 (EDT)
>X-eGroups-Return: sentto-1013941-15166-1021021438-houseofamusements=compuserve.com@returns.groups.yahoo.com
>Received: from [66.218.67.194] by n20.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 May 2002 09:03:58 -0000
>X-Sender: a.williams17@ntlworld.com
>X-Apparently-To: ukvac@yahoogroups.com
>Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_3_2); 10 May 2002 09:03:57 -0000
>Received: (qmail 82369 invoked from network); 10 May 2002 09:03:57 -0000
>Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
> by m12.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 May 2002 09:03:57 -0000
>Received: from unknown (HELO mta03-svc.ntlworld.com) (62.253.162.43)
> by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 May 2002 09:03:56 -0000
>Received: from LAPTOP ([62.255.16.181]) by mta03-svc.ntlworld.com
> (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with SMTP
> id <20020510090355.ZWRK295.mta03-svc.ntlworld.com@LAPTOP>
> for <ukvac@yahoogroups.com>; Fri, 10 May 2002 10:03:55 +0100
>Message-ID: <006001c1f801$b2682530$b0c3193e@LAPTOP>
>To: <ukvac@yahoogroups.com>
>References: <3.0.6.32.20020507191146.00ad64e0@pop.ntlworld.com>
>X-Priority: 3
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
>From: "The Dalek" <a.williams17@ntlworld.com>
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Mailing-List: list ukvac@yahoogroups.com; contact ukvac-owner@yahoogroups.com
>Delivered-To: mailing list ukvac@yahoogroups.com
>Precedence: bulk
>List-Unsubscribe: <
mailto:ukvac-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
>Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 10:03:46 +0100
>Subject: Re: [ukvac] OT: Van insurance
>Reply-To: ukvac@yahoogroups.com
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>
>
>Hi,
>
>Yes interesting problem !
>
>I had an escort van that was cheap to run, cheap parts, cheap insurance at
>£140 for the year. The van was an L Reg and was a great runner !
>
>Then insurance renewel time came, my present company said they dont insure
>vans anymore for private use and then gave me a company which did who took
>great pleasure in taking £270 for the next years premium .
>
>Resulting in me selling the van, getting an escort estate and a box trailer
>that will carry upto a ton and a half. ( Pitty the bloody car wouldnt pull a
>ton and a half ! )
>
>For people in similar problems, dont be tempted to tell insurance companies
>that you are a business when you are clearly not, at the very least they
>could invalidate your insurance or charge you a shit load more, even worse
>make a complaint to the police stating that you have obtained insurance by
>way of a deception.
>
>My advice to anyone with this problem,
>
>Get an Estate.
>Get a Towbar
>Get a Trailer
>
>Result : Nobody breaks the rules, Vans being sold on the market eventually
>get cheaper because nobody wants them as people cant insure them.
>
>Being a driver for 15 years I can rememeber when insurance compaines would
>not insure High powered cars like Cosworths and GTI's GTEs etc. Then they
>invented the immobilizer and lo and behold every bugger has got one !
>
>Thats my two penny worth anyway.
>
>ONE LAST THING> I am doing a trip between Newport ( Gwent ) and Raunds
>(Northamptonshire) on Tuesday, Does anyone want any machines moved between
>these points on Tuesday ?
>
>Reply offlist :
>
>The Dalek.
>
>
>
DATA Imported from archives: originally posted by (houseofamusements@compuserve.com)
