ChrisBinary said:I had been considering submitting a score to them but I can't be bothered now, what a joke. They have clearly known about Todds cheating for 15+ years and did nothing until now.
What game is it Chris?
ChrisBinary said:I had been considering submitting a score to them but I can't be bothered now, what a joke. They have clearly known about Todds cheating for 15+ years and did nothing until now.
smarty said:sort of related to this, I see claims are now being made with some of Billy Mitchels DK scores, something about the direct feeds being from MAME not real hardware.
jugemscloud said:just further evidence of how outmoded using actually hardware is in the context of the internet and current computational sophistication. the only means i can see of having some truly objective system would be a website where name or similar was hosted and people could log in to play and have scores verified through it as there is some form of objectivity in a system like that though it could still be tampered with (see LMAO box for an example of manipulating only online games - TF2 on steam).
jugemscloud said:i was inferring to an optimal system where there are no technical issues, i probably should have been implicit though.
jugemscloud said:the issue then becomes about inputs especially routine games such as pacman where a physical device could be created that physically inputs the correct controls rather than just a script that does this to the code like a TAS.
jugemscloud said:ideally small groups could be an option, but i have my reservations see the earlier note about the inner coterie of TG (46 minutes in in King of Kong - the ladybug scene), the corruptive element of power may also be an important factor of consideration i know from recent first hand experience that there are "high standing" members of the uk arcade community whose moral integrity is questionable at the very least (this is understatement).
jugemscloud said:i.e. joysticks and buttons that are to american stock standards or british how far does the categorisation go or at what point is there an acceptable baseline. (see the mr.awesome trackball debacle for how far some people can take this)
jugemscloud said:there will probably never be a 100% fool proof system, and best to play for self satisfaction/achievement than to be gauged against some questionable metric
SUPERSPRINT said:He does say that he doesn’t even own a single arcade cabinet at home, so his use of MAME and subsequent submissions of scores from practicing using MAME does make sense. He kind of hung of himself really by admitting that he doesn’t own any arcade machines.